Thursday, March 27, 2014

Theory of Mind and Mirror Neurons

I had written in this blog in November 2013 about mirror neurons. My wife and I had played with our new born granddaughter and found she could imitate simple finger and hand movements within a few weeks of her birth.

I got so excited documenting this phenomenon that I threw the baby out with the bath water – figuratively that is! There is a lot more to mirror neurons than learning finger and hand movements by imitation. There is some evidence to suggest that mirror neurons can explain one of the most essential features of being human. You see someone in pain, and you wish to help. You give someone something, say a toy. You see it makes them happy and you are pleased. Humans relate to each other and understand innately that they are like one another – with similar thoughts, similar emotions, similar beliefs and desires. No one teaches us all this in any detail, but we all understand this. Psychologists refer to this understanding we have of each other as the “theory of mind”. Visit

Where would we be without a theory of mind? Cannibals or worse? Would a human society be possible in the absence of this phenomenon?

This suggests that one can play games with babies and children to see how they respond to human emotions, real and simulated. Do they tend to be happier with someone who seems to be happy? Do they show signs of being depressed if the care giver appears to be depressed? Psychologists invent games of this kind all the time. The Wikipedia article referred above describes a fascinating game (the Sally-Anne game) for relatively older children, not babies. The article also reports that children with autism perform poorly in this game, which tests for the child having a theory of mind. However, children with Down’s syndrome do well in this test, as is to be expected by anyone who has known children with Down’s syndrome.

Another thought was triggered by the following:
It seems that the phenomenon of “adaptation” sets in when a child watches you do something a lot of times. I understand this as follows: if you want a baby to imitate you, don’t demonstrate the action many times before expecting imitation. Imitation comes early on in the experiment. Once the child imitates you, adaptation will still occur (the child will stop imitating you!), but it will take a bit longer to take place. It appears, in other words, that imitated actions seem to be better remembered.


Srinivasan Ramani 

No comments: